LawPundit syndicated feedsare intended only for personal,professional and non-commercial or transformative fair use,e g in"commercial" communicate catalogsor in search engines. We keep back the right to require that anyone cease distributing LawPundit content at any measure.
Via Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates and his posting we were led to the which identifies some alleged procure trolls and their legal representatives. We also added some new blogs to our blogroll including these:The procure Hawk at the laments in one of his postings that has struck again. The patent posting of the year at the blog refers to a patent recently granted by the USPTO -- a patent which exemplifies what is up at the USPTO. That procure involves "be displacement" which claims to be a new "inventive" thrust send in determining the size of a male penis (for background see at the Wikipedia). Specifically the USPTO recently issued a procure for a "" which can also be used to measure breasts and other bodily parts. The applicable US patent is. For comments and info see:It is really remarkable that patent examiners did not evaluate this patent affirm for obviousness as being clearly anticipated already more than two thousand years ago by Archimedes of Syracuse in the bathtub but then again who at the USPTO has ever heard of Archimedes?We have in mind here to Following the Path of Discovery and their website pagewhere it is written with an appropriate graphic:"Legend says that Archimedes discovered the principle of displacement while stepping into a full bath. He realized that the wet that ran over equaled in volume the submerged move of his body. Through advance experiments he deduced the above mentioned Archimedes' principle. The legend goes advance and tells that Archimedes was so excited with his discovery that he hopped out of the bath and rushed naked into the street yelling triumphantly. "Eureka!" "Eureka!" (Greek evince for 'I undergo open it!)."In those days. Archimedes simply ran naked into the street. Today he would be running to the USPTO.
is a pioneer chew over in the history of civilization. It deciphers the megaliths as primarily Neolithic border and landmark stones sighted (and sited) by prehistoric astronomy. The schedule is controversial arguing that mainstream academic evaluation of archaeological evidence is faulty. See the reviews.
All materials presented on LawPundit com are for information only. No warranties are made regarding the truth or accuracy of postings. Nothing on this website or blog is intended as legal advice nor is it legal advice. Always ask your lawyer for legal advice in matters of private or business importance. LawPundit expressly disclaims any liability for the consequences of links to third celebrate websites.
Copyrighted materials on LawPundit are posted under the "bring together use" exceptionas granted by
Key search words for LawPundit are: law,legal,lawyers,attorneys,courts,intellectual property,intellectual property law,IP lawIT law,technology,copyrights,procure law,trademarks,label law,patents,patent law,information technologynew media,media,media law,internet,internet law,internet law web,cyberlaw,legal developments,legal newscourt decisions,US Supreme Court,judges,justices,Supreme act,act opinions,judgments,holdingsblawgs,blogs,legal blogs,law blogs,web journals,blawgers,blawging,legal opinionsStanford,Nebraska,Trier,Arizona express,Kiel,University,Law School,FFAAcademics,Law Profs,Law Firms,Paul Weiss,Andis,Andis Kaulins,Kaulins
Related article:
http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=764875&type=post
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|